Pengaruh Kewenangan Supervisor Terhadap Respon Auditor Di Lingkungan Perwakilan Badan Pengawasan Keuangan Dan Pembangunan Provinsi Papua (Studi Pada Instalasi Farmasi Kabupaten Dinas Kesehatan Kabupaten Pegunungan Bintang)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52062/.v3i2.2558Abstract
The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of referent power variables, expert power, legitimate power, reward power, and coercive power as independent variables to performance improvement and impression management as dependent variables. This research has the purpose to answer the characteristic of exploratory, descriptive, explanation, and prediction research, using the survey method like questionnaire containing the question list that will be given to the respondent to be filled as purpose to get the information from the respondent. data processing using WarpPLS 5.0. The results of the study show that reference power, appreciation power, and coercive power influence the improvement of performance and impression management, while expert power and legitimate power have no effect on performance improvement and impression management.Downloads
References
Andrew P. Marunduh. 2016. “Pengaruh Diskusi Verbal Dalam Review Kertas Kerja Audit,
Pengalaman Kerja, Dan Motivasi Terhadap Kinerja Auditor Pada Kantor Bpk Ri Perwakilan
Sulawesi Utara.â€
Https://Ejournal.Unsrat.Ac.Id/Index.Php/Goodwill/Article/View/13561/13147.
Arikunto. 2006. Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktek. Jakarta: Pt. Rineka Cipta.
Averina, Monika, And Ranto P Sihombing. 2013. “Pengaruh Diskusi Review Kertas Kerja Audit
Terhadap Motivasi Dan Kinerja Auditor Pada Kap Di Semarang.†Jurnal Akuntansi Bisnis 12
(23): 71–97. Http://Journal.Unika.Ac.Id/Index.Php/Jab/Article/View/425.
Dacin, T. Goodstein, J. Scott, W.R. 2002. “Institutional Theory And Institutional Change :
Introductionto The Special Research Forum.†Academy Of Management Journal 45(1): 45–56.
Dian Indah Hayati. 2016. “Pengaruh Good Corporate Governance (Gcg) Terhadap Manajemen
Kesan Studi Empiris Pada Perusahaan Bursa Efek Indonesia Tahun 2016.â€
Dimaggio, P. J. Dan W. W. Powell. 1983. N.D. “The Iron Cage Revisited : Institutional
Isomorphism And Collective Rationality In Organizational Fields.†American Sociological
Review 48 (2): 147–160.
Fedor Donald B, And 2007 Ramsay Robert J. 2007. “Effects Of Supervisor Power On Preparers
Responses To Audit Review: A Field Study.†Behavioral Research In Accounting 19: 91–105.
Https://Doi.Org/Http://Aaapubs.Org/Loi/Bria.
Ghozali, Imam, And Hengky Latan. 2014. Partial Least Squares Konsep, Metode Dan Aplikasi
Menggunakan Program Warppls 5.0. Third. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas
Diponegoro.
Januarti, Indira, And Imam Ghozali. 2013. “Supervisor Power And Auditor Experience Influencing
Auditor €Tm S Response†4 (2): 8–19.
Https://Pdfs.Semanticscholar.Org/580e/E8e8db1ec4d5a95ddaf3b91ac16ec4c1ad98.Pdfhttps://
Pdfs.Semanticscholar.Org/580e/E8e8db1ec4d5a95ddaf3b91ac16ec4c1ad98.Pdf.
Jupri Pabeno. 2016. “Determinan Penggunaan Sistem Pengukuran Kinerja Sektor Publik.â€
Akuntansi & Keuangan Daerah Volume 11 Nomor 1: 13–28.
Luneto Abdul Razak, Hendra Gunawan Dan Pupung Purnama Sari. 2015. “Pengaruh Pengalaman
Kerja Dan Perilaku Keberagamaan Terhadap Kinerja Auditor (Pada Kantor Akuntansi Publik
Di Kota Bandung).†Http://Eprints.Ums.Ac.Id.
Nurrahmat. 2015. “Pengaruh Supervisor Power Terhadap Respon Auditor Pada Pemeriksa Bpk Ri.â€
In Skripsi. Semarang. Http://Eprints.Undip.Ac.Id/45454/1/01_Nurrahmat.Pdf.
Robbins Sp Dan Judge. 2007. Perilaku Organisasi,. Empat,. Jakarta.: Salemba Empat.
Sekaran, Uma. 2003. Research Methods For Business : A Skill Building Aproach. New York - Usa:
John Wiley And Sons, Inc.
Sugiyono. 2005. Metode Penelitian Bisnis. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Sugiyono. 2017. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif Dan R & D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
