Pelatihan Analisis Data Penelitian Tindakan Kelas Bagi Guru SMA/SMK Di Wilayah Kabupaten Dan Kota Jayapura
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52062/.v4i2.2238Abstract
Several previous studies provide evidence that Classroom Action Research benefits teachers in improving a deep understanding of students’ thinking and learning, making changes to the teaching and developing teacher’s professional process, improving self-confidence in teaching ability and changing insights about teaching and learning and renewing commitment to the teaching profession. Currently the problem that occurs is that some teachers have not been optimal in conducting and producing good class action research reports, as well as creating articles sourced from class action research activities carried out that can then be published through scientific journals. In order to improve the competence of teachers to be able to produce a scientific paper that can be used as publication article of scientific journals carrying out class action research training activities for high school/vocational teachers in the Jayapura Regency and Jayapura City. Trainig Data Analysis Class Action Research uses the practical method of data analysis using SPSS analysis tools, the purpose of using this method is to ensure that this training can provide increased competence and understanding for participants during the training.Downloads
References
Afandi, M. (2014). Pentingnya Penelitian Tindakan Kelas Bagi Guru Dalam Pembelajaran Di Sekolah
Dasar. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar UNISSULA, 1(1), 1–19.
Arikunto, Suharsimi, et al. (2006). Penelitian Tindakan Kelas. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Buaraphan, K. (2016). The development of qualitative classroom action research workshop for inservice science teachers. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 17(1).
Capobianco, B. M., & Feldman, A. (2010). Repositioning teacher action research in science teacher
education. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 21, 909-915.
Cox-Petersen, A. M. (2001). Empowering science teachers as researchers and inquirers. Journal of
Science Teacher Education, 12(2), 107-122.
Fitria, H., Kristiawan, M., & Rahmat, N. (2019). Upaya Meningkatkan Kompetensi Guru Melalui
Pelatihan Penelitian Tindakan Kelas. Abdimas Unwahas, 4(1), 14–25.
Illeris, K. (2004). The three dimensions of learning. Malabar: Fla Krieger Pub. Co. ISBN
Jana, P., & Pamungkas, B. (2018). Pelatihan Penelitian Tindakan Kelas Bagi Guru Sd Negeri
Guwosari. Abdimas Dewantara, 1(1), 39.
Kusumah, W. (2010). Alasan Guru Takut Lakukan PTK,. 2010.
Llewellyn, D., & Zee, E. (2010). Action research: Expanding the role of classroom teachers to
inquirers and researchers. Science Scope, 34(1), 10-15.
Megowan-Romanowicz, C. (2010). Inside out: Action research from the teacher-researcher
Perspectve. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 21, 993-1011.
Moeleong, L. J. (1993). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Pramusinto, H., Murniawaty, I., Purasani, H. N., & Suryani, N. (2019). Hasil Ptk Guru Ekonomi Sma
Kabupaten Semarang. 02(01), 14–18.
Saipurrahman. (2015). Mengapa Guru Kurang Mampu Melakukan PTK. 2015.
Supriyanto, A. (2017). Peningkatan Kemampuan Guru Dalam Penulisan Karya Ilmiah Melalui
Pelatihan Penelitian Tindakan Kelas. Abdimas Pedagogi, 1(1), 1–7.
http://journal2.um.ac.id/index.php/pedagogi/article/view/1944
Widayati, A. (2014). Penelitian Tindakan Kelas. Jurnal Pendidikan Akuntansi Indonesia, 6(1).