PENGUJIAN TEORI FRAUD PENTAGON TERHADAP FRAUDULENT FINANCIAL REPORTING (Studi Empiris pada Perusahaan yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia Tahun 2011-2015)

Authors

  • Helda F. Bawekes
  • Aaron M. A. Simanjuntak
  • Sylvia Christina Daat

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52062/jakd.v13i1.1429

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to examine the effect of fraud pentagon theory in explaining phenomenon of fraudulent financial reporting at Indonesian companies in the year period of 2011 to 2015. This research uses 9 (nine) independent variables to achieve this objective, namely:
Financial targets, Financial stability, External pressure, Institutional ownership, Ineffective monitoring, External audit quality, Changes in auditors, Change of directors, and Frequent number of CEO's picture. The dependent variable was used is fraudulent financial reporting that proxied by restatement. This research uses 210 samples from 42 companies listed on Indonesia Stock Exchange in the year between 2011 and 2015. This research had done by conduncting a quantitative method with secondary data. This secondary data was taken from the financial statements, which are downloaded from the company's website and the Indonesia Stock Exchange web. Method of determining the sample in this research were using purposive sampling. And logistic regression method was used as a data analysis tool. The result of this research proves that financial stability and frequent number of CEO's picture have significant effect to the fraudulent financial reporting. However, financial targets, external pressure, institutional ownership,
ineffective monitoring, external audit quality, changes in auditors and directors change have no significant effect on the fraudulent financial reporting

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anshori, M. F. (2015). Model Pendeteksian Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan Oleh Auditor Spesialis

Industri Dengan Analisis Fraud Triangle. Skripsi Program S1. Fakultas Ekonomi dan

Bisnis Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah. Jakarta, 1-124.

Cressey, D. 1953. Other People’s Money: a Study in the Social Psychology of Embezzlement.

Glencoe, IL: Free Press.

Horwarth, C. 2010. “IIA Practice Guide : Fraud and Internal Auditâ€.

Horwarth, C. 2010. “Playing Offense in a High-risk Environmentâ€

Horwarth, C. 2012. “The Mind Behind The Fraudsters Crime: Key Behavioral and Environmental

Elementâ€

Ghozali, I. H. 2016. Aplikasi Analisi Multivariete dengan Program IBM SPSS 23. Edisi 8,

Semarang : Universitas Diponegoro.

Hanifa, S. I. 2015. Pengaruh Fraud Indicators Terhadap Fraudulent Financial Statement (Studi

Empiris Pada Perusahaan yang Listed di BEI Tahun 2008-2013). Skripsi Program S1.

Fakultas Ekonomika dan Bisnis Universtas Diponegoro. Semarang, 1 -90.

Hapsari, A. D. (2014). Pendeteksian Tingkat Fraud Melalui Faktor Risiko, Tekanan Dan Peluang

(Studi Kasus Pada Perusahaan Perbankan Periode 2012-2012). Naskah Publikasi Ilmiah.

Surakarta: Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.

Kurniawati, E. 2012. Analisis Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Financial Statement Fraud

Dalam Perspektif Fraud Triangle. Skripsi Program S1. Fakultas Ekonomika dan Bisnis

Universitas Diponegoro. Semarang. , 1-68.

Manurung, D. T., & Hadian, N. (2013).Detection Fraud of Financial Statement with Fraud

Triangle.Proceedings of 23rd International Business Research Conference. Melbourne.

Norbarani, Listiana. 2012. “Pendeteksian Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan Dengan Analisis Fraud

Triangle Yang Diadopsi Dalam SAS No 99.†Skripsi Program S1. Fakultas Ekonomika

dan Bisnis Universitas Diponegoro. Semarang.

Rachmawati, K. K. 2014. Perspektif Fraud Triangle Terhadap Fraudulent Financial Reporting

(Studi Kasus pada Perusahaan Berdasarkan Sanksi dari Bapepam Periode 2008-2012.

Skripsi Program S1. Fakultas Ekonomika dan Bisnis Universitas Diponegoro. Semarang,

-73.

Rahmanti, M. M. 2013. “Pendeteksian Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan Melalui Faktor Risiko

Tekanan dan Peluang (Studi Kasus pada Perusahaan yang mendapat Sanksi dari Bapepam

Periode 2002-2006).â€Diponegoro Journal OfAccounting. Vol. 2, No. 2, 1 -12.

Sihombing, K. S. 2014. Analisis Fraud Diamond dalam Mendeteksi Financial Statement Fraud:

Studi Empiris pada Perusahaan Manufaktur yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia

Tahun 2010-2012. Skripsi Program S1. Fakultas Ekonomika dan Bisnis Universitas

Diponegoro.Semarang.

Skousen, J.C., Wright, J.C., Smith Kevin, R. 2009, “Detecting and Predicting Financial Statement

Fraud: The Effectiveness of The Fraud Triangle and SAS No. 99.†Corporate and Firm

Performance Advances in Financial Economics, Vol. 13, h. 53-81.

Tessa, C. 2016. Fraudulent Financial Reporting: Pengujian Teori Fraud Pentagon Pada Sektor

Keuangan Dan Perbankan Di Indonesia. Jurnal Akuntansi, 1-20.

Wolfe, David T and Dana R. Hermanson 2004. “The Fraud Diamond: Considering the Four

Elements of Fraudâ€. CPA Journal. 74.12:38-42

Additional Files

Published

2020-12-12

How to Cite

Bawekes, H. F., Simanjuntak, A. M. A., & Daat, S. C. (2020). PENGUJIAN TEORI FRAUD PENTAGON TERHADAP FRAUDULENT FINANCIAL REPORTING (Studi Empiris pada Perusahaan yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia Tahun 2011-2015). JURNAL AKUNTANSI DAN KEUANGAN DAERAH, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.52062/jakd.v13i1.1429

Issue

Section

Artikel