Penyelesaian Sengketa Tanah (Adat) Suku Korowai
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31957/jap.v2i1.2001Keywords:
Completion, Dispute, Land, custom, Korowai TribeAbstract
The purpose of this article is to describe and analyze the mechanism for resolving customary land disputes in the Korowai tribe. The research method used is the approach used in this study is a qualitative descriptive approach. The location of this research was determined in Yanimura District, Boven Digoel Regency. Because of the considerations in that place there are always land disputes. The data collection process used was observation, interviews and FGD. And the data analysis process includes stages, data categorization, data description and data interpretation. The results show that land has an important meaning in the culture of the Koroeai tribe because it is related to values and sources of life. Disputes (ownership) of land that occur are often spearheaded by claims from 2 different owners, and because of differences in the determination of the boundaries of customary land ownership that is communally owned by clans, or certain communities. Settlement of customary land disputes of the Korowai tribe can be resolved by the customary parties as well as possible to mediate between the two warring parties. Then, a system of sanctions in the form of fines is given to parties who are considered detrimental to other parties.Downloads
References
Anam, S. (2012). Loan 1360-INO: Senior Secondary Education Proyect. Jakarta: PT. Dian Rakyat.
Creswell, J. W. (2016). Research Design Pendekatan Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, dan Mixed. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar
Frank, S. A. K., Wenehen, A., & Idris, U. (2020). The land tenure and the land use among supiori in Papua. ETNOSIA: Jurnal Etnografi Indonesia, 105-118.
Frank, S. A. K. (2009). Membayangkan adat: suatu kajian tentang tanah adat, sengketa dan penyelesaiannya di kotamadya dan kabupaten Jayapura Provinsi Papua.
Idris, U. (2017). Belimpun Taka Tugas, Insuai Taka Tapu’: Orang Tidung, Marginalisasi dan Perlawanan di Pulau Sebatik, Nunukan. ETNOSIA: Jurnal Etnografi Indonesia, 2(12), 134-152.
Keesing, R. M. (1992). Antropologi Budaya Suatu Pspersfektif Konpotenporer.Jakarta: Erlangga
Kontjaranigrat, & Bachtir, H.W (eds). (1963). Penduduk Irian Barat. Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia.
Koten B., Gobay, D. (2018). Papua Bukan Tanah Kosong: Beragam Peristiwa dan Fakta Hak Asasi Manusia di Tanah Papua 2018. Jayapura: SKPKC Fransiskan Papua.
Lekitoo, H. Y. (2012). Potret manusia pohon: komunitas adat terpencil Suku Korowai di daerah selatan Papua dan tantangannya memasuki peradaban baru. Jakarta: Balai Pustaka.
Moleong, J., L. (2009). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakaya.
Ridwan. (2009). Metode Dan Teknik Menyusun Proposal Penelitian. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Roembiak, M. D. (eds). (1993). Etnografi Irian Jaya: Panduan Sosial Budaya, Buku Satu Kelompok Peneliti Etnografi, Irian Jaya. Uncen Press: Jayapura.
Spradley, J. P. (2009). Metode Etnografi. Terjemahan oleh Misbah Yulfa. Elisabeth. Yogyakarta: PT Tiara Wacana
Setiadi, T. (2013). Intisari Hukum Adat Indonesia: Dalam Kajian Pustaka. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Sugiyono. (2010). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Sulastri, E.A., Flassy, M., Akhmad. (2020). OPRA: Gerakan Perempuan Adat dan Perubahan Sosial pada Suku Bangsa Namblong di Lembah Grime di Kanupaten Jayapura. Cenderawasih: Jurnal Antropologi Papua, 1(2), 149 –164.
Sumardjono, M. S. (2008). Mediasi sengketa tanah: potensi penerapan alternatif penyelesaian sengketa (ADR) di bidang pertanahan. Jakarta: Penerbit Buku Kompas.
Syarief, E. (2014). Menuntaskan Sengketa Tanah Melalui Pengadilan Khusus Pertanahan. Jakarta: Kepustakaan Populer Gramedia.
