Struktur dan Fungsi Oru Dia dalam Kebudayaan Suku Yokari
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31957/jap.v2i2.2026Keywords:
Structure, Function, Ora Dia, Megalitic, Yokari Tribe, Culture, JayapuraAbstract
Oru dia is a megalithic cultural phenomenon in the form of a circular stone structure, and the stones serve as a seat when customary deliberations are conducted. The existence of this orudia is very interesting to be disclosed about the structure, function and role in the life of Yokari tribe society so that until now still be maintained. Therefore the method used to express about the oru dia by using qualitative approach and data presentation is descriptive. The process of collecting data through interviews, observation, and literature study. While the analysis uses functional structural analysis and hermeneutic data interpretation. The result of this research is the finding of a number of oru dia in kampung which are in Yokari District area. Oru dia-oru dia is made of a number of stones arranged horizontally to form a circle, and in the middle of the circle there is a fireplace. The stones in oru dia are the seats of the Yarona who are the ondowafi messengers who perform their duties and functions based on adat. The existence of this oru dia illustrates the existence of a working structure of traditional tools, and the customary devices will be consulted and cooperate in carrying out the Ondoafi command on the implementation plan of an event or event such as a traditional party, Ondoafi's appointment ceremony as well as in termination of the case. Based on the structure of the oru dia can be known its function is as a place of deliberation, where the coronation of Ondoafi, the place of ratification of the verdict and the place of judging the case. The role of oru dia is as a unifying symbol or a tool that holds the whole of Yokari society, as a symbol of Ondoafi's power, meeting place or customary musyawarah center, place of ratification of a customary decision, Ondoafi's inauguration place witnessed directly by the sun and the universDownloads
References
Akhmad, A., Idris, U., & Siregar, L. (2018). Mitos Sawerigading (epos Lagaligo): Suatu analisis struktural dan penafsiran. ETNOSIA: Jurnal Etnografi Indonesia, 224-249.
Aronggear, R.P., Poli, A.I., Mansoben, J.R. (2020). Peran Klan dalam Pemilihan Kepala Kampung Tahima Soroma, Jayapura. Cenderawasih: Jurnal of Antropologi Papua, 1(1), 21-33.
Assa, V. R., & Usmany, D. P. (2015). Sistem Kepemimpinan “Seraâ€. Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. Direktorat Jenderal Kebudayaan. Balai Pelestarian Nilai Budaya Jayapura-Papua.
Djami, E. N. Idje. (2017). Tipologi dan Makna Tinggalan Megalitik di Pesisir Pantai Utara Kabupaten Jayapura. Amerta Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengembangan Arkeolgi, 35(1), 33-46.
Endrawarsa, S. (2006). Metodologi Penelitian Kebudayaan. Gadjah Mada University Press. Yogyakarta.
Frank, S. A. K. (2012). Arsitektur Tradisional Suku Arfak di Manokwari. Yogyakarta, Kepel Press.
Hapsari, W., Frank, S.A.K., Mansoben, J.R. (2020). Fungsi dan Nilai Khayi (Perahu Perempuan) bagi Orang Sentani di Kampung Ayapo Kabupaten Jayapura. CENDERAWASIH: Jurnal Antropologi Papua, 1(2), 134 – 148.
Heine, G. R. v. (1945). Prehistoric Research in the Netherland Indies. Science and Scientist in the Netherlands Indies. New York, Board for the Netherlands Indies, Surinam and Curacao.
Hindom, R.F., Yuliana, Wenehen, A. (2020). Perubahan Fungsi Tarian Tummour pada Suku Mbaham Matta. Cenderawasih: Jurnal Antropologi Papua, 1(1), 34- 50.
Indiyanto, A. (2014). Lokalitas, Tempat, Dan Ruang Dalam Antropologi. Dalam Teori, Etnografi dan Refleksi. Edt. Heddy Shri Ahimsa-Putra. Diterbitkan kerjasama PINTAL dan Jurusan Antropologi Budaya Universitas Gadjah Mada. Yogyakarta. (hlm 69-83).
Kadir, A., Poli, A. I., Hijjang, P., idris, usman, Ali, A., & Sokoy, F. (2021). Local wisdom regarding coastal resource management among a fishermen community in Youtefa Bay, Papua. ETNOSIA: Jurnal Etnografi Indonesia, 6(1), 36 - 46.
Koestoro, L. P. (edt). (2012). Arkelogi dan Karakter Bangsa. Balai Arkeologi Medan. Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.
Latifundia, E. (2013). Sumberdaya Arkeologi Situs Cipari Sebagai Aset Pendidikan dan Ilmu Pengetahuan (hlm 89-98). Dalam Prosiding Seminar Nasional Dalam Rangka 100 Tahun Purbakala. Potensi Arkeologi dan Pemanfaatannya Untuk Masyarakat Luas. Balai Arkeologi Bandung. Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.
Mabel, R., Flassy, M., Numberi, G. K. I. (2020). Relasi Gender dalam Keluarga pada Suku Hubula di Kampung Isaima Distrik Usilimo Kabupaten Jayawijaya. CENDERAWASIH: Jurnal Antropologi Papua, 1(2), 104 –133.
Miles, B. B. dan Huberman, A. M. (1992). Analisis Data Kualitatif: Buku Sumber Tentang Metode-Metode Baru. Penerbit Universita Indonesia (UI-Press). Jakarta
Prasetyo, B., Bintarti, D.D., Yuniawati, D. Y., Kosasi, E.A., Jatmiko, Handini, R., & Saptomo, E. W. (2004). Religi Pada Masyarakat Prasejarah di Indonesia. Kementerian Kebudayaan dan Pariwisata. Proyek Penelitian dan Pengembangan Arkeologi. Jakarta.
Prasetyo, B. (2015). Megalitik: Fenomena yang Berkembang di Indonesia. Kemendikbud, Balitbang, Puslit Arkenas. Penerbit Galang Press. Yogyakarta.
Prasetyo, B. (2016). Prolog Megalitik Dalam Spektrum Budaya Nusantara. Dalam Eksotisme Megalitik Nusantara. Prasetyo, B. (Edt). Gadjah Mada University Press. Yogyakarta.
Sanggenafa, C. O. I., & Hidayana, I. M. (2020). Peran Dewan adat Suku Sentani untuk Penyelesaian Konflik Kekerasan dalam Rumah Tangga. Cenderawasih: Jurnal Antropologi Papua, 1(1), 8-12.
Soejono, R.P & Leirissa, R.Z (Edt). 2010. Sejarah Nasional Indonesia I, Zaman Prasejarah di Indonesia. Edisi Pemutakhiran. Balai Pustaka. Jakarta.
Turner, V. (1968). The Drums Of Affliction: A Study of Religious Peocesses among the ndembu of Zambia. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Turner, V. (1967). The Forest of Symbols: Aspects of Ndembu Ritual. Ithaca and London: Cornell Univercity Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Accepted 2022-04-20
Published 2021-12-10
