Rekonsiliasi Kosmis melalui Tradisi “Nahe Biti”: Tinjauan Etika Diskursus Penyelesaian Konflik Komunal
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31957/jap.v7i1.5671Keywords:
Nahe Biti, Discourse Ethics, Cosmic Reconciliation, Communal Conflict, Restorative JusticeAbstract
The resolution of communal conflicts at the grassroots level often reaches an impasse when relying solely on the state's positive-retributive legal approach, which tends to overlook the psychological and cultural restoration of the community. In Timor-Leste and its border regions, the traditional practice of Nahe Biti ("unrolling the mat") serves as an effective alternative mechanism for restoring post-conflict social relations. This study aims to analyze the communicative structure within the Nahe Biti tradition through the lens of Jürgen Habermas's Discourse Ethics (Diskursethik), exploring how a just peace consensus is locally produced. This study employs a qualitative-descriptive method with a Critical Ethnographic approach. Data were gathered through in-depth interviews with customary elders (Lian Nain), perpetrators, and victims of conflict, alongside participatory observation of the ritual reconstruction. The study reveals that the Nahe Biti tradition actualizes the "ideal speech situation" (ideale Sprechsituation) by flattening social hierarchies through the symbolic unrolling of the mat to ensure the inclusivity of all voices. However, Nahe Biti transcends Habermas’s secular rationality by integrating the dimension of "cosmic reconciliation." Peace does not merely bind human actors but also involves non-human entities (ancestors and nature) through blood sacrifice rituals and customary oaths (Tara Bandu). This study concludes that this cosmological-relational communication model offers a profound critique of Western transitional justice while theoretically contributing to the development of localized restorative justice models in Indonesia and the wider region.
Downloads
References
Babo-Soares, D. (2004). Nahe Biti: The philosophy and process of grassroots reconciliation (and justice) in East Timor. The Asia Pacific Journal of Anthropology, 5(1), 15–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/1444221042000201647
Braithwaite, J. (2002). Restorative justice & responsive regulation. Oxford University Press.
Carspecken, P. F. (1996). Critical ethnography in educational research: A theoretical and practical guide. Routledge.
Charlesworth, H., & Wood, M. (2002). Women and human rights in the rebuilding of East Timor. Nordic Journal of International Law, 71(2), 325–348. https://doi.org/10.1163/157181002761931349
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Cumbe, J. (2016). Local practices for conflict resolution: The case of Nahe Biti in Timor-Leste. Journal of Peacebuilding & Development, 11(2), 101–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/15423166.2016.1193309
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2018). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Ehrlich, E. (2002). Fundamental principles of the sociology of law. Transaction Publishers. (Original work published 1913).
Eriksen, E. O., & Weigård, J. (2003). Understanding Habermas: Communicative action and deliberative democracy. Continuum.
Fairclough, N. (2013). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Flyvbjerg, B. (2006). Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(2), 219–245. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800405284363
Grenfell, L. (2006). Legal pluralism and the rule of law in Timor-Leste. Leiden Journal of International Law, 19(2), 305–337. https://doi.org/10.1017/S092215650600331X
Habermas, J. (1984). The theory of communicative action: Vol. 1. Reason and the rationalization of society (T. McCarthy, Trans.). Beacon Press.
Habermas, J. (1990). Moral consciousness and communicative action (C. Lenhardt & S. W. Nicholsen, Trans.). MIT Press.
Habermas, J. (1993). Justification and application: Remarks on discourse ethics (C. P. Cronin, Trans.). MIT Press.
Habermas, J. (1996). Between facts and norms: Contributions to a discourse theory of law and democracy (W. Rehg, Trans.). Polity Press.
Habermas, J. (2006). Religion in the public sphere. European Journal of Philosophy, 14(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9205.2006.00275.x
Hicks, D. (2004). Ritual and belief: Readings in the anthropology of religion (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Hohe, T., & Nixon, R. (2003). Rebuilding local capacities for governance: Customary institutions in Timor-Leste. World Bank Working Paper. World Bank.
Kawulich, B. B. (2005). Participant observation as a data collection method. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 6(2), Article 43. https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-6.2.466
Kent, A. (2012). Local justice in Southern Africa and Timor-Leste: Restorative politics and transitional justice. Routledge.
Llewellyn, J. J., & Howse, R. (1999). Restorative justice—A conceptual framework. Dalhousie Law Journal, 22(1), 355–388.
Low, S. M., & Lawrence-Zúñiga, D. (Eds.). (2003). The anthropology of space and place: Locating culture. Blackwell Publishing.
Madison, D. S. (2011). Critical ethnography: Method, ethics, and performance (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.
McWilliam, A. (2007). Customary land tenure and public interest in Timor-Leste. Anuac, 14(1), 81–98.
Melsasail, A. (2019). Konflik kultural dan resolusi adat Suku Lovaia melalui tradisi Nahe Biti. Jurnal Sosiologi Agama, 13(1), 75–92. https://doi.org/10.14421/jsa.2019.131-04
Menkel-Meadow, C. (2007). Restorative justice: What’s law got to do with it? Fordham Urban Law Journal, 33(1), 161–175.
Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Poulson, B. (2003). A third voice: Restorative justice in horizontal conflicts. Utah Law Review, 2003(1), 155–180.
Prior, L. (2003). Using documents in social research. SAGE Publications.
Scott, J. (1990). A matter of record: Documentary sources in social research. Polity Press.
Spradley, J. P. (2016). The ethnographic interview. Waveland Press. (Original work published 1979).
Tyler, T. R. (2006). Why people obey the law. Princeton University Press.
Van Dijk, T. A. (1993). Principles of critical discourse analysis. Discourse & Society, 4(2), 249–283. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926593004002006
Viveiros de Castro, E. (2004). Exchanging perspectives: The transformation of objects into subjects in Amerindian ontologies. Common Knowledge, 10(3), 463–484. https://doi.org/10.1215/0961754X-10-3-463
Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (Eds.). (2016). Methods of critical discourse studies (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Zehr, H. (2015). The little book of restorative justice (Revised ed.). Good Books.
