Model Kontekstual Perencanaan Pembangunan Daerah: Studi Kasus Provinsi Papua
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31957/jeb.v10i1.2215Keywords:
Contextual Model, Papua Province, Special AutonomyAbstract
This study aims to identify and analyze the orientation of meeting the basic socioeconomic needs of the community with the context of Papua, determine and analyze the contextual model of regional development planning in Papua Province, the factors that determine the success of implementing the contextual model of regional development planning in Papua. This study uses a qualitative descriptive method and leads to a case study approach. The data collection method used in-depth interview techniques, content analysis, and Focus Group Discussion (FGD). The results show that development planning must be based on the local context of Papua. What is done by the Government is to build public awareness of the importance of implementing government programs such as in terms of health. Health needs to be monitored from the perspective of the behavior of the Papuan people, namely from cleanliness, fulfillment of nutrition, and fulfillment of basic immunizations. However, the good intentions of this government are considered bad by the Papuan people so that the contextual implementation of this development requires the role of traditional leaders, religious leaders, officials in the village so that the development of the Papua Province is in accordance with a contextual model based on the aspirations of the people in the Papua Province.
Downloads
References
Bisai, C. M., Maria, K., & Dan Achmad, R. P. (2019). Analisa Pembangunan Manusia Dan Pengaruhnya Terhadap kesejahteraan Masyarakat Di Provinsi Papua. Jurnal Kajian Ekonomi & Keuangan Daerah, 4(3), 184-219.
BPS. (2020). Provinsi Papua dalam Angka. BPS, Jayapura.
Bugin, B. (2011). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif: Komunikasi Ekonomi, Kebijakan Publik, dan Ilmu Sosial Lainnya. Prenada Media Group
Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approach. Second Edition. Sage Publication, Inc.
Daryanto, A., & Hafizrianda, Y. (2018). Model-model Kuantitatif untuk Perencanaan Pembangunan Ekonomi Daerah: Konsep dan Aplikasi. PT Penerbit IPB Press.
Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of management Review, 20(1), 65-91.
Djojosoekarto, A., Qisai, A., Musyadat, A., Iksanto, M. A., Suryaman, C., Sumirat, B. W., Gama, F., Affianto, A., & Tohari, A. (2012). Nilai-nilai Dsar Orang Papua dalam Mengelola Tata Pemerintahan (Governance). Centre for Learning and Advancing Experimental Democracy.
Ermasari, A., Sukamdi, S., & Tukiran, T. (2009). Dinamika Kemiskinan di Jawa-Madura Menurut Kabupaten/Kota Tahun 2002-2007. Majalah Geografi Indonesia, 23(1), 1-17.
Fayakun, M., & Joko, P. (2015). Efektivitas pembelajaran fisika menggunakan model kontekstual (ctl) dengan metodepredict, observe, explain terhadap kemampuan berpikir tingkat tinggi. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Indonesia, 11(1), 49-58.
Gunadi. (2008). Ketentuan dasar pajak penghasilan. Jakarta: Penerbit Salemba.
Hudson BM .(1979).Comparison of Current Planning theories: Counterparts and Contradictions. J APA, 45(4).
Jauch, L. R., Glueck, W. F., Murad, D., & Sitanggang, A. (1999). Manajemen strategis dan kebijakan perusahaan.
Karsiman, K. (2020). Kebijakan Pemerintah Dalam Pembangunan Yang Berbasis Kearifan Lokal Menuju Masyarakat Sejahtera Di Kabupaten Teluk Bintuni Papua Barat. Gema Kampus IISIP YAPIS Biak, 15(1), 72-77.
Kartikasari, S.N., Marshall, A. J., & Beehler, B. M. (2012). Ekologi Papua. Penerbit Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia dan Conservation International.
Katharina, R. (2016). Implementasi Kebijakan Pembentukan Unit Percepatan Pembangunan Provinsi Papua dan Provinsi Papua Barat (UP4B) dalam Konteks Otonomi Khusus. Jurnal Politica Dinamika Masalah Politik Dalam Negeri dan Hubungan Internasional, 6(2).
Kitzinger, J. (1996). Introducing Focus Groups. British Medical Journal, 311, 299– 302.
Lehoux, P., Blake, P., & Daudelin, G. (2006). Focus Group Research and “The Patient’s View.†Sosial Science and Medicine, 63, 2091–2104.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, M. (1990). Qualitative Data Analysis. Sage Publications.
Morissan. (2019). Riset Kualitatif. Prenada Media Group.
Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological Reseach Methods. Sage Publication. Muhadjir, N. (2002). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Rake Sarasin.
Mukhtar. (2013). Metode Praktis Penelitian Deskriptif Kualitatif. REFERENSI (GP Press).
Nazaki, N., Handrisal, S., & Handrisal, S. (2018). Peran Pemerintah dalam Pengembangan Usaha Mikro Kecil dan Menengah di Kota Tanjungpinang.
Raidyarto, A. (2018). Analisa Strategis Kesiapan Papua Menjadi Provinsi Cerdas. Konferensi Nasional Sistem Informasi (KNSI) 2018.
Raharjo, W. T., & Harnovinsah. (2021). Analisis Pendapatan Asli Daerah, Dana
Suharyo, S. (2016). Otonomi Khusus di Papua dan Aceh Sebagai Perwujudan Implementasi Peranan Hukum Dalam Kesejahteraan Masyarakat. Jurnal Rechts Vinding: Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional, 5(3), 323-337.
Talitha, T. (2017). Rethinking Metropolitan Governance: An Exploration of Urban Entrepreneurialism in Decentralized Indonesia.
Trianto. (2012). Model-model pembelajaran Inovatif Berorientasi Kontruktivisme. Jakarta: prestasi Pustaka Raya
Widjojo, M. S., Amiruddin, A. R. E., Pamungkas, C., & Dewi, R. (2008). Papua road map. Indonesian Institute of Sciences, Jakarta.
