Governance Breakdown dan Ketegangan Sosial Ekologis: Implementasi Perlindungan Kawasan Penyangga Cagar Alam Cycloop Kabupaten Jayapura

Authors

  • Daud Balli Program Doktor Ilmu Sosial Program Pascasarjana Universitas Cenderawasih, Indonesia
  • Agustinu Fatem Program Doktor Ilmu Sosial Program Pascasarjana Universitas Cenderawasih , Indonesia
  • Yosephina Ohoiwutun Program Doktor Ilmu Sosial Program Pascasarjana Universitas Cenderawasih , Indonesia
  • Vince Tebay Program Doktor Ilmu Sosial Program Pascasarjana Universitas Cenderawasih , Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31957/jeb.v13i3.5277

Keywords:

local governance, village legislation, indigenous peoples, legal pluralism, inclusive participation

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the implementation of the protection and management policy for the Cycloop Mountains Nature Reserve buffer zone in Jayapura by highlighting the issues of governance breakdown and socio-ecological tensions resulting from the weak institutionalization of customary legitimacy. The study employed a qualitative approach with a case study design, through in-depth interviews, Focus Group Discussions (FGDs), participant observation, and documentation studies involving the government, indigenous communities, migrant communities, non-governmental organizations, and academics. Data were analyzed thematically using NVivo with a Systems Theory framework, Grindle's content-context approach, and the Edwards III implementation model. The results indicate that the failure of the Cycloop buffer zone policy implementation is caused by institutional fragmentation, overlapping authority, weak cross-sectoral coordination, limited resources, and low-effectiveness of policy communication. In addition, the lack of integration of customary legitimacy and local knowledge into formal policies weakens social legitimacy and triggers conflicts over resource utilization between conservation interests and community economic needs. This condition creates a negative feedback loop that accelerates the ecological degradation of the buffer zone and impacts community social welfare. This study concludes that protecting the Cycloop buffer zone requires more inclusive and adaptive governance reforms through strengthening institutional coordination, recognizing customary legitimacy, and implementing a community-based conservation approach to ensure ecosystem sustainability and social justice.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Barnes, M. L. (2021). Indigenous and local knowledge in biodiversity monitoring: Insights from Papua, Indonesia. Conservation Science and Practice, 3(9), e492. https://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.492

Barnes, M. L., Ahmad, R., McNamara, K. E., & Thomson, R. J. (2023). Conservation justice and governance gaps in protected areas: Lessons from the Cyclops Mountains, Papua, Indonesia. World Development, 165, 106191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2023.106191

Bertalanffy, L. von. (1950). An outline of general system theory. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 1(2), 134–165. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/I.2.134

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Dawson, N. M., Coolsaet, B., Sterling, E. J., Loveridge, R., Gross-Camp, N. D., Wongbusarakum, S., Sangha, K. K., Scherl, L. M., Phan, H. P., Zafra-Calvo, N., Lavey, W. G., Byakagaba, P., Idrobo, C. J., Chenet, A., Bennett, N. J., Mansourian, S., & Rosado-May, F. J. (2021). The role of Indigenous peoples and local communities in effective and equitable conservation. Ecology and Society, 26(3), 19. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-12625-260319

Edwards, G. C. III. (1980). Implementing public policy. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.

Ford, A., Naghavi, M., & Mayfield, H. (2020). Deforestation leakage and the effectiveness of protected areas. Nature Sustainability, 3(4), 308–315. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-020-0483-4

Grindle, M. S. (2017). Politics and policy implementation in the Third World. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Oldekop, J. A., Holmes, G., Harris, W. E., & Evans, K. L. (2016). A global assessment of the social and conservation outcomes of protected areas. Conservation Biology, 30(1), 133–141. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12568

Ostrom, E. (2009). A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social–ecological systems. Science, 325(5939), 419–422. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1172133

Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Spracklen, D. V., Kalamandeen, M., Galbraith, D., Gloor, E., & Spracklen, B. D. (2015). A global analysis of deforestation in moist tropical forest protected areas. PLoS ONE, 10(12), e0143886. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143886

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 5 Tahun 1990 tentang Konservasi Sumber Daya Alam Hayati dan Ekosistemnya.

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Downloads

Published

2024-12-19

How to Cite

Balli, D., Fatem, A., Ohoiwutun, Y., & Tebay, V. (2024). Governance Breakdown dan Ketegangan Sosial Ekologis: Implementasi Perlindungan Kawasan Penyangga Cagar Alam Cycloop Kabupaten Jayapura . JURNAL EKOLOGI BIROKRASI, 13(3), 143–154. https://doi.org/10.31957/jeb.v13i3.5277

Citation Check