SAR AND ITS IMPLICATIONS ON BIODIVE RESOURCES CONSERVATION IN WASUR NATIONAL PARK AREA, PAPUA

Authors

  • Maikel Simbiak Universitas Cenderawasih, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31957/jipi.v9i3.1802

Keywords:

Sar, Conservation, Biological Resources, Wasur National Park

Abstract

The landscape ethnoecological study approach also explores the significance of local systems in understanding ecological sustainability, including its implementation in biocultural conservation education. In this view, a study has been carried out on the traditions of the indigenous people of Wasur Village in Wasur National Park, regarding the practice of sar rituals and their relationship with education in Wasur National Park for biodiversity conservation to obtain an initial view from a biological perspective. This study uses an ethnological study approach with data collection through free interview techniques to key informants, library surveys, and free lists. The results of interviews with key informants revealed that the sar tradition is a ritual of respecting relatives who have died through a prohibition on the use of all forms of resources on family land that was left behind for a thousand days of mourning. Based on the literature survey, it was found that the period of a thousand days can support the regeneration of several specific macropod species in the Trans Fly area such as Dorcopsis spp, Macropus agile, and Thylogale spp. Sar is an example of a sasi system known by several tribes on the north coast of Papua which is promoted as culture-based conservation

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abraao, MB, Shepard, GH, Nelson, BW, Baniwa, JC, Andrello,G & Yu, DW 2010,‘Baniwa vegetation classification in the White-Sand Campinarana habitat of the Northwest Amazon’, dalamLM Johnson& ES Hunn (ed.),Landscape ethnoecology: Concepts of biotic and physical space, Berghahn, New York,hh. 83–115;

Arka, I 2013,‘Language management and minority language maintenance in (eastern) Indonesia: strategic issues,’Language Documentation & Conservation, vol. 7, hh. 74–105;

Berkes, F 1993,‘Traditional ecological knowledge in perspective,’dalamJT Inglish (ed.),Traditional ecological knowledge: concept and case, Canadian Museum of Nature and International Development Research Centre,Ottawa, hh. 1–9;

Berkes, F 2008,Sacred ecology, edisi kedua, Routledge 270 Madison Ave, New York;

Berkes, F, Colding, J& Folke, C 2000,‘Rediscovery of traditional ecological knowledge as adaptive management’,Ecological Applications, vol. 10, no. 5,hh. 1251–1262;

Bolton, BL, Newsome, AE & Merchant, JC 1982,‘Reproduction in the agile wallaby Macropus agilis (Gould) in thetropical lowlands of the Northern Territory: opportunism in aseasonal environment’,Australian Journal of Ecology, vol. 7, hh. 261–277;

Burenhult, N 2008,‘Streams of words: hydrological lexicon in Jahai’,Language Sciences, vol. 30,hh. 182–199;

Davidson-Hunt, IJ 2003,‘Indigenous Lands Management, Cultural Landscapes and Anishinaabe People of Shoal Lake, Northwestern Ontario, Canada’,dalamD Bavington& S. Slocombe (ed.), Managerial Ecology: Counterproposals. Environments, vol. 31, no. 1, hh.21–41;

Davidson-Hunt, I& Berkes, F 2003,‘Learning as you journey: Anishinaabe perception of social-ecological environment and adaptive learning’,Conservation Ecology, vol. 8, no. 1,artikel 5, dilihat 21 Januari 2021;

Duvall, CS 2008,‘Classifying physical geographic features: the case of Maninka farmers in southernwestern Mali’,Geofrasica Annaler: Series B, Human Geography,vol. 90, no. 4, hh 327–348;

Gilmore, MP, Ochoa, SR& Flores, SR 2010,‘The cultural significant of the habitat Manaco Taco to the Maijuna of the Peruvian Amazon’,dalamLM Johnson& ES Hunn (ed.) Landscape ethnoecology: Concepts of biotic and physical space,Berghahn, New York, hh. 141–158;

Gonzalez-Robledo, LM, Gonzalez-Robledo,MC & Nigenda, G 2012,‘Dentist education and labour market in Mexico: elements for policy definition’Human Resources for Health, vol. 10, no. 31, https://doi.org/10.1186/1478-4491-10-31;

Hunn, ES & Meilleur, BA 2010, ‘Toward a theory of landscape ethnoecological classification’,dalamLM Johnson & ES Hunn (ed.),Landscape ethnoecology: Concepts of biotic and physical space,Berghahn, New York, hh, 15–26;

Hutchins, M, Kleiman, DG, Geist, V & McDade, MC (ed.) 2003, Grzimek’s Animal Life Encyclopedia. Vol. 12. Mammals I-V, edisi kedua, Ml: Gale Group, Farmington Hills;

Johnson, M 1992,Lore: capturing traditional environmental knowledge, Dene Cultural Institute and the International Development Research Centre, Ottawa;

Johnson, LM 2000,‘A place that’s good, Gitksan landscape perception and ethnoecology’,Human Ecology, vol. 28, no. 2, hh. 301–325;

Johnson, LM& Hunn, ES 2010,Landscape ethnoecology. Concepts of physical and biotic space,Berghahn, New York;

Kosmaryandi, N 2012,‘Taman Nasional Wasur: Mengelola taman nasional di wilayah masyarakat adat’,Media Konservasi, vol. 7, no. 1, hh. 6–15;

Levinson, SC 2008,‘Landscape, seascape and the ontology of places on Rossel Island, Papua New Guinea’,Language Sciences, vol. 30, hh. 256–290;

Machar, I 2015,‘Local place names as a part of landscape memory (Case study from Haná region, Czech Republic’,AUC Geographica, vol. 49, no. 1, hh. 61–69;

Mansoben, JR 2003,‘Konservasi sumber daya alam Papua ditinjau dari aspek budaya’,Jurnal Antropologi Papua, vol. 2, no. 4, hh 1–12;

Mark, DM, Turk, AG& Stea, D 2010,‘Ethnophysiography of arid lands: Categories for landscape features’, dalamLM Johnson& ES Hunn (ed.),Landscape ethnoecology: Concepts of biotic and physical space,Berghahn, New York, hh. 27–48;

Martin, GJ 1995,‘Ethnobotany: A methods manual’, Springer Science+Business Media, B.V, Dordrecht;

McCarter, J, Gavin, MC, Baereleo, S& Love, M 2014,‘The challenges of maintaining indigenous ecological knowledge’,Ecology and Society,vol. 19, no. 3,artikel 39,dilihat 21 Januari 2021;

Meilleur, BA 2010,‘The structure and role of folk ecological knowledge in Les Allues, Savoie (France)’,dalamLM Johnson& ES Hunn (ed.),Landscape ethnoecology: Concepts of biotic and physical space, Berghahn, New York, hh. 159–174;

Mihas, E 2015,‘Landscape terms in Alto Perené Kampa (Arawak) of Peru’,Acta Linguistica Hafniensia, vol. 47, no. 2, hh. 101–135, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03740463.2015.1096599;

Mote, N & Mahuze, A 2016, ‘Kearifan lokal sar dalam melestarikan ikan di suku Marori – Men Gey, Kampung Wasur Kabupaten Merauke’,https://meraukelanguages.org/id/publications, dilihat 09September 2021;

Muliyawan, MB, Basuni, S& Kosmaryandi, N 2013,‘Kearifan Tradisional Perlindungan dan Pemanfaatan Sumberdaya Hutan oleh Suku Kanume di Taman Nasional Wasur’, Media Konservasi,vol. 18, hh. 142–51;

Paijmans, K 1976,New Guinea vegetation, Australian National University Press, Canberra;

Posey, DA 1985,‘Indigenous management of tropical rainforest ecosystems: the case of the Kayapo Indians of the Brazilian Amazon’,Agroforestry Systems, vol. 3, hh. 139–158;

Riu-Bosoms, C, Vidal, T, Duane, A, Onrubia, AFL, Gueze, M, Luz, AC, Marcia, MJ, Paneque-Galves, J& Reyes-Garcia, V 2014,‘Exploring indigenous landscape classification across different dimensions: A case study from the Bolivian Amazon’,Landscape Research, vol. 40, no. 3, hh. 318–337;

Silva, TC, Medeiros, MFT, Peroni, P& Albuquerque, UP 2016,‘Folk classification as evidence of transformed landscapes and adaptive strategies: a case study in the semiarid region of northeastern Brazil’,Landscape Research, vol. 4, no. 5, hh. 521–523, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01426397.2016.1258047;

Simbiak, M, Supriatna, J, Walujo, EB & Nisyawati 2019,‘Review: Current status of ethnobiological studies in Merauke, Papua, Indonesia: A perspective of biological-cultural diversity conservation’,Biodiversitas, vol. 20, no. 12, hh. 3455–3466,https://doi.org/10.13057/biodiv/d201201;

Simbiak, M 2020, Etnoekologi dan etnobotani suku asli di sekitar kawasan Taman Nasional Wasur, Merauke, Papua. Disertasi Program Studi Pascasarjana Biologi Universitas Indonesia;

Sohn, MS, Lebold, L& Kriens, R 2009, Report on the Merauke subdistrict survey Papua, Indonesia, Summer Institute of Language International;

Sulistyawan, BS, Verweij, PA, Boot, RGA, Purwanti, B, Rumbiak, W, Wattimena, MC, Rahawarin, P& Adzan, G 2018,‘Integrating participatory GIS into spatial planning regulation: the case of Merauke District, Papua, Indonesia’,International Journal of Commons, vol. 12, no. 1, hh. 26–59;

Supriatna, J 2014,Berwisata alam di Taman Nasional, Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia, Jakarta;

Suryawan, IG 2017,‘Pemertahanan bahasa ibu tentang tempat-tempat sakral dan tantangan perubahan sosial budaya orang Marori dan Kanum di Kabupaten Merauke, Papua’,Jurnal Masyarakat dan Budaya, vol. 19, no. 3, hh. 397–418;

Toledo, VM 2001,‘Biodiversity and indigenous peoples’,dalam AS Levin (ed.), Encyclopedia of Biodiversity, Academic Press, San Diego, California,hh. 330–340;

Warib, M 1996,‘Suku Marind-anim di Kabupaten Merauke’,dalam Etnografi Irian Jaya Seri-2: Marind, Moi, Nafri, Meyakh, dan manusia Indonesia-Irian di tahun 2000, Pemerintah Provinsi Daerah Tingkat I Irian Jaya, Jayapura,hh. 1 – 64;

Wartmann, FM & Purves, RS 2018, ‘This is not the jungle, this is my barbecho’: semantics of ethnoecological landscape categories in the Bolivian Amazon’,Landscape Research, vol. 43, no. 1, hh. 77–94;

Yarman 2012,‘Interaksi masyarakat suku asli (masyarakat adat) dengan masyarakat pendatang dan implikasinya pada rancangan pengelolaan Taman Nasional Wasur,’ Tesis, Institut Pertanian Bogor, Bogor.

Downloads

Published

2021-10-12

How to Cite

Simbiak, M. (2021). SAR AND ITS IMPLICATIONS ON BIODIVE RESOURCES CONSERVATION IN WASUR NATIONAL PARK AREA, PAPUA. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Indonesia, 9(3), 153–164. https://doi.org/10.31957/jipi.v9i3.1802

Issue

Vol. 9 No. 3 (2021)

Section

Articles

Citation Check