MALPRAKTEK DALAM PENYELENGGARAAN PEMILU ANGGOTA DPRD KABUPATEN WAROPEN TAHUN 2019 (STUDI KASUS TENTANG PELAKSANAAN REKAPITULASI HASIL PENGHITUNGAN PEROLEHAN SUARA TINGKAT KABUPATEN)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31957/jkp.v4i2.1741Keywords:
Election, Election Malpractice, Vote Recapitulation, Kabupaten WaropenAbstract
Election is a democratic party that guarantees freedom, justice and equality for individuals in determining leaders in the executive and legislative fields. In every stage of the election process, there must be opportunities for problems, errors and violations such as violence, buying and selling of votes, and manipulation. It is undeniable that violations that include manipulation of election regulations, voter choice and electoral administration in the implementation of the recapitulation of the results of the vote count at the district level, still color the implementation of elections. The purpose of this study is to find out, analyze and describe the forms and factors that influence electoral malpractice in the recapitulation of the results of the calculation of the votes acquired by the candidates for members of the Waropen Regency DPRD at the district level in the 2019 Election. The research method uses a qualitative descriptive approach. Collecting data using in-depth interview techniques and active observation. Research informants are Election Organizers and Secretariats and Election Contestants. Data analysis techniques through the stages of preparation, codification, topic description, and data presentation. The results of the study indicate that there were electoral malpractice actions that occurred before and during the recapitulation of the results of the counting of district-level votes in the Election for Candidates for Members of the Waropen Regency DPRD in 2019 in the form of manipulation of voter choices and manipulation of electoral administration. Factors that influence the occurrence of electoral malpractice are the negligence of the election organizers and the existence of vote buying by election participants (candidates) against the election organizersDownloads
References
Akhmad, A., & Idris, U. (2020, May). Politik “Nokenâ€: Properti Budaya Pada Arena Kontestasi Kekuasaan di Papua. In Seminar Nasional dan Pra Lokakarya ADJASI 2018.
Awaluddin. (2019). Malpraktik Pemilu Di Tempat Pemungutan Suara Pada Pemungutan Dan Penghitungan Suara Pemilu Serentak Tahun 2019.Electoral Governance Jurnal Tata Kelola Pemilu Indonesia Vol. 1 (1).
Birch, S. (2011). Electoral Malpractise. 0xford: Oxford University Press.
Dinati, Febriyani Hilda. (2018). Malpraktik Pemilu Pada Pileg 2014 Di Kabupaten Badung: Studi Kasus Tentang Mobilisasi Pemilih Pengguna KTP. Thesis, Universitas Airlangga.
Creswell, J. W. (2016). Research Design Pendekatan Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, dan. Mixed. Yoyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar
Evarukdijati. (2019). “Bawaslu Tangani 63 Kasus Pidana Pemilu Di Papuaâ€. Sri Muryono (Ed.) [online] Available at: https://www.antaranews.com/berita/876107/bawaslu-tangani-63-kasus-pidana-pemilu-di papua?. (Retrieved Sept 9, 2020).
Harmoko, R., & Afif, Z. (2021). Peranan Badan Pengawasan Pemilu terhadap Sengketa Pemilu Tahun 2019 (Studi Di Kantor Bawaslu Kabupaten Batubara). JURNAL PIONIR, 7(1).
Muttaqin, M. Z., Idris, U., & Ilham, I. (2021). Tantangan Implementasi Netralitas PNS (Kajian Kekerasan Simbolik dalam Pilkada). JWP (Jurnal Wacana Politik), 6(1), 1-14.
Peraturan KPU Nomor 4 Tahun 2019 tentang Rekapitulasi Hasil Penghitungan Perolehan Suara dan Penetapan Hasil Pemilihan Umum
Prihatmoko, J. Joko. (2003). Pemilu 2004 dan Konsolidasi Demokrasi. Semarang:LP2I.
Rahmatunnisa, M. (2017). Mengapa Integritas Pemilu Penting?.Jurnal Bawaslu, Vol 3(1), Pp. 1-11. ISSN 2443-2539.
Rika, Hesti. (2019). “KPU Sebut Noken Tak Bisa Dipersoalkan Dalam Gugatan Di MKâ€. [online] Available at: https://www.cnnindonesia.com/nasional/20190715164907-12-412287/kpu-sebut-noken-tak-bisa-dipersoalkan-dalam-gugatan-di-mk.(Retrieved Sept 9, 2020).
Saputra, A. D. (2020). Penerapan Sanksi Pelanggaran Administratif Pemilu bagi Penyelenggara Pemilu. PLENO JURE, 9(2), 129–142.
Solihah, R., & Witianti, S. (2017). Permasalahan dan Upaya Mewujudkan Pemilu Demokratis di Indonesia Pasca Reformasi. Jurnal Bawaslu, 3(1).
Suhard, Gaudensius. (2020). “Malapraktik Pilkadaâ€. [online] Available at:https://mediaindonesia.com/podiums/detail_podiums/1868- (Retrieved Sept 9, 2020).
Syaefudin, M. (2019). Kewenangan Dewan Kehormatan Penyelenggara Pemilu (DKPP) Dalam Menegakan Kode Etik Pelanggaran Pemilihan Umum. Jurnal USM Law Review, 2(1), 104–120.
Syafriandre, A., Zetra, A., & Amsari, F. (2019). Malpraktik Dalam Proses Verifikasi Partai Politik Di Indonesia: Studi Pada Pemilihan Umum 2019. Jurnal Wacana Politik, 4, 14–29.
Undang-undang (UU) Nomor 7 Tahun 2017 tentang Pemilihan Umum
Yasmin, A. Amelia (2019). “Riset temukan tiga penyebab praktik kecurangan pada pemilu 2014 dan 2019â€.[online] Available at:https://theconversation.com/riset-temukan-tiga-penyebab-praktik-kecurangan-pada-pemilu-2014-dan-2019-130188. (Retrieved Sept 9, 2020).
