Peer Review Process

  • For Reviewer

    • Reviewers need to comment on ethical questions and possible violations of research and publication.
    • The reviewer will do the work on time and must notify the editor if they cannot complete the work.
    • Reviewers need to maintain the confidentiality of the manuscript.
    • Reviewers may not accept to review texts where there is a potential conflict of interest between them and any writer.
    • The reviewer must be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the writer is incorrect. Reviewers must express their views clearly accompanied by supporting arguments.
    • Reviewers must identify publications that have not been cited by the author. A statement about observations or arguments that have been published before must be accompanied by relevant citations. The reviewer must inform the editor of a substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript being reviewed and other published writings, in accordance with the reviewer's knowledge.
    • Blind peer review by reviewers helps editors make decisions and can help writers improve their writing through editorial communication between reviewers and writers. Peer review is an important component in formal scientific communication (formal scholarly communication) and scientific approaches.

  • Untuk Reviewer

    • Peninjau perlu mengomentari pertanyaan etis dan kemungkinan pelanggaran penelitian dan publikasi.
    • Reviewer akan mengerjakan pekerjaannya tepat waktu dan harus memberitahukan editor jika tidak dapat menyelesaikan pekerjaannya.
    • Reviewer perlu menjaga kerahasiaan naskah.
    • Peninjau tidak boleh menerima peninjauan teks jika terdapat potensi konflik kepentingan antara mereka dan penulis mana pun.
    • Reviewer harus dilakukan secara obyektif. Kritik pribadi terhadap penulis tidak benar.
    • Reviewer harus mengungkapkan pandangannya secara jelas disertai argumen pendukung.
    • Reviewer harus mengidentifikasi publikasi yang belum dikutip oleh penulis.
    • Pernyataan mengenai observasi atau argumentasi yang telah dipublikasikan sebelumnya harus disertai dengan kutipan yang relevan.
    • Reviewer harus memberi tahu editor tentang adanya kesamaan substansial atau tumpang tindih antara naskah yang sedang direview dan tulisan lain yang diterbitkan, sesuai dengan pengetahuan reviewer.
    • Tinjauan sejawat buta oleh pengulas membantu editor membuat keputusan dan dapat membantu penulis meningkatkan tulisan mereka melalui komunikasi editorial antara pengulas dan penulis. Peer review merupakan komponen penting dalam komunikasi ilmiah formal (formal Scientific Communication) dan pendekatan ilmiah.