Analisis Ketimpangan Antar Daerah dalam Mendorong Pembangunan Ekonomi di Provinsi Papua Pegunungan

Authors

  • Elok Dining Lestari Universitas Cenderawasih
  • Elsyan R. Marlissa Universitas Cenderawasih

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56076/jkesp.v12i3.5520

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the level of interregional inequality and the influence of population and per capita income on economic development inequality in Papua Mountains Province during the 2018-2022 period. The research method used is associative research with quantitative secondary data obtained from the Central Bureau of Statistics of Yahukimo Regency. Data analysis was conducted using three descriptive tools, namely the Williamson Index to measure the level of inequality, Klassen Typology to classify regions based on economic growth and per capita income, and Location Quotient to identify basic and non-basic sectors. Furthermore, to test the influence of independent variables on inequality, this study applied panel data regression with the help of Eviews 9 software, through a series of model specification tests, classical assumption tests, as well as partial and simultaneous hypothesis tests. The results show that interregional inequality in Papua Mountains Province is classified as high and continues to increase significantly from year to year, with all Williamson Index values falling into the high category. Based on the Klassen Typology, no regency falls into the fast-growing and advanced region category, while Yahukimo and Tolikara Regencies fall into the lagging region category. The Location Quotient analysis results indicate that the agriculture, construction, and various public service sectors are basic or leading sectors. The hypothesis test results prove that population and per capita income, both partially and simultaneously, have a positive and significant effect on economic development inequality. Thus, inequality in Papua Mountains Province is a serious problem triggered by the high population and unequal per capita income, which requires comprehensive and targeted policy interventions.

 Keywords: Regional Inequality, Economic Development, Population, Per Capita Income  

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ariansyah, T. S. (2017). Analisis pengaruh jumlah penduduk, PDRB per kapita, tingkat pendidikan dan tingkat kesehatan terhadap jumlah penduduk miskin di Kabupaten Malang tahun 2001-2015. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa FEB, 5(2).

Arif, M., dan Wicaksani, R. A. (2017). Ketimpangan pendapatan propinsi Jawa Timur dan faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhinya. URECOL, 323-328.

Arsyad, L. (2010). Ekonomi pembangunan. UPP STIM YKPN.

Azizah, E. W., Sudarti, S., dan Kusuma, H. (2018). Pengaruh pendidikan, pendapatan perkapita dan jumlah penduduk terhadap kemiskinan di Provinsi Jawa Timur. Jurnal Ilmu Ekonomi, 2(1), 167-180.

Badan Pusat Statistik. (2015). Pedoman perhitungan proyeksi penduduk dan angkatan kerja. Badan Pusat Statistik.

De Fretes, P. N. (2017). Analisis sektor unggulan (LQ), struktur ekonomi (shift share), dan proyeksi produk domestik regional bruto Provinsi Papua 2018. Develop, 1(2).

Firman, F., Parinusa, S., dan Maspaitella, M. R. (2023). Analisis peranan sektor industri pengolahan dalam perekonomian Provinsi Papua Barat pendekatan input-output. Lensa Ekonomi, 17(1), 17-37.

Hartini, N. T. (2017). Pengaruh PDRB per kapita, investasi dan IPM terhadap ketimpangan pendapatan antar daerah di Provinsi DIY tahun 2011-2015. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Ekonomi, 6(6), 530-539.

Kurniawati, A. D., & Cahyono, H. (2022). Optimalisasi pertumbuhan ekonomi daerah dengan analisis sektor unggulan di Papua. Independent: Journal of Economics, 2(3), 49-63.

Maspaitella, M., Parinussa, S. M., & Tewernusa, K. I. (2021). Applying location quotient and shift-share analysis in determining leading sectors in Teluk Bintuni Regency. Journal of Developing Economies, 6(1), 55-65.

Muharam, K. I. (2022). Analisis ketimpangan pendapatan di Provinsi Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta tahun 2015-2020 (Studi kasus di 4 kabupaten dan 1 kota di Provinsi DIY). Journal of Development Economic and Social Studies, 1(2), 284-294.

Nagao, K. (1993). Changing Regional Income Disparities in Canada, 1951-1989. Journal Free Access, 45(6), 559-580.

North, D. C. (1991). Institutions. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5(1). 97-112.

Perkasa, V. D. (2023). Papua dan Ekonomi Politik yang Destruktif. [https://www.kompas.id/artikel/ papua-dan-ekonomi-politik-yang-destruktif]

Sama, A. A. F. (2018). Analisis faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi ketimpangan pendapatan di Sulawesi (Tahun 2011-2015). Jurnal Ilmiah Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.

Sjafrizal. (2008). Ekonomi regional: Teori dan aplikasi. Baduose Media.

Suyatno. (2000). Pembangunan daerah di Indonesia. (Tidak dipublikasikan – disebut dalam artikel sebagai sumber rujukan).

Williamson, J. G. (1965). Regional inequality and the process of national development: A description of patterns. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 13(4), 3-45.

Nilawati, E. (2019). Analisis dan Strategi Peningkatan Pendapatan Asli Daerah (PAD) di Kabupaten Gunungkidul. Jurnal Maksipreneur: Manajemen, Koperasi, Dan Entrepreneurship, 9(1), 41–60.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-05

How to Cite

Lestari, E. D., & Marlissa, E. R. (2025). Analisis Ketimpangan Antar Daerah dalam Mendorong Pembangunan Ekonomi di Provinsi Papua Pegunungan. Jurnal Kajian Ekonomi Dan Studi Pembangunan, 12(3). https://doi.org/10.56076/jkesp.v12i3.5520

Issue

Section

Articles