Analisis Ketimpangan Antar Daerah dalam Mendorong Pembangunan Ekonomi di Provinsi Papua Pegunungan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56076/jkesp.v12i3.5520Abstract
This study aims to analyze the level of interregional inequality and the influence of population and per capita income on economic development inequality in Papua Mountains Province during the 2018-2022 period. The research method used is associative research with quantitative secondary data obtained from the Central Bureau of Statistics of Yahukimo Regency. Data analysis was conducted using three descriptive tools, namely the Williamson Index to measure the level of inequality, Klassen Typology to classify regions based on economic growth and per capita income, and Location Quotient to identify basic and non-basic sectors. Furthermore, to test the influence of independent variables on inequality, this study applied panel data regression with the help of Eviews 9 software, through a series of model specification tests, classical assumption tests, as well as partial and simultaneous hypothesis tests. The results show that interregional inequality in Papua Mountains Province is classified as high and continues to increase significantly from year to year, with all Williamson Index values falling into the high category. Based on the Klassen Typology, no regency falls into the fast-growing and advanced region category, while Yahukimo and Tolikara Regencies fall into the lagging region category. The Location Quotient analysis results indicate that the agriculture, construction, and various public service sectors are basic or leading sectors. The hypothesis test results prove that population and per capita income, both partially and simultaneously, have a positive and significant effect on economic development inequality. Thus, inequality in Papua Mountains Province is a serious problem triggered by the high population and unequal per capita income, which requires comprehensive and targeted policy interventions.
Keywords: Regional Inequality, Economic Development, Population, Per Capita Income
Downloads
References
Ariansyah, T. S. (2017). Analisis pengaruh jumlah penduduk, PDRB per kapita, tingkat pendidikan dan tingkat kesehatan terhadap jumlah penduduk miskin di Kabupaten Malang tahun 2001-2015. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa FEB, 5(2).
Arif, M., dan Wicaksani, R. A. (2017). Ketimpangan pendapatan propinsi Jawa Timur dan faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhinya. URECOL, 323-328.
Arsyad, L. (2010). Ekonomi pembangunan. UPP STIM YKPN.
Azizah, E. W., Sudarti, S., dan Kusuma, H. (2018). Pengaruh pendidikan, pendapatan perkapita dan jumlah penduduk terhadap kemiskinan di Provinsi Jawa Timur. Jurnal Ilmu Ekonomi, 2(1), 167-180.
Badan Pusat Statistik. (2015). Pedoman perhitungan proyeksi penduduk dan angkatan kerja. Badan Pusat Statistik.
De Fretes, P. N. (2017). Analisis sektor unggulan (LQ), struktur ekonomi (shift share), dan proyeksi produk domestik regional bruto Provinsi Papua 2018. Develop, 1(2).
Firman, F., Parinusa, S., dan Maspaitella, M. R. (2023). Analisis peranan sektor industri pengolahan dalam perekonomian Provinsi Papua Barat pendekatan input-output. Lensa Ekonomi, 17(1), 17-37.
Hartini, N. T. (2017). Pengaruh PDRB per kapita, investasi dan IPM terhadap ketimpangan pendapatan antar daerah di Provinsi DIY tahun 2011-2015. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Ekonomi, 6(6), 530-539.
Kurniawati, A. D., & Cahyono, H. (2022). Optimalisasi pertumbuhan ekonomi daerah dengan analisis sektor unggulan di Papua. Independent: Journal of Economics, 2(3), 49-63.
Maspaitella, M., Parinussa, S. M., & Tewernusa, K. I. (2021). Applying location quotient and shift-share analysis in determining leading sectors in Teluk Bintuni Regency. Journal of Developing Economies, 6(1), 55-65.
Muharam, K. I. (2022). Analisis ketimpangan pendapatan di Provinsi Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta tahun 2015-2020 (Studi kasus di 4 kabupaten dan 1 kota di Provinsi DIY). Journal of Development Economic and Social Studies, 1(2), 284-294.
Nagao, K. (1993). Changing Regional Income Disparities in Canada, 1951-1989. Journal Free Access, 45(6), 559-580.
North, D. C. (1991). Institutions. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5(1). 97-112.
Perkasa, V. D. (2023). Papua dan Ekonomi Politik yang Destruktif. [https://www.kompas.id/artikel/ papua-dan-ekonomi-politik-yang-destruktif]
Sama, A. A. F. (2018). Analisis faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi ketimpangan pendapatan di Sulawesi (Tahun 2011-2015). Jurnal Ilmiah Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.
Sjafrizal. (2008). Ekonomi regional: Teori dan aplikasi. Baduose Media.
Suyatno. (2000). Pembangunan daerah di Indonesia. (Tidak dipublikasikan – disebut dalam artikel sebagai sumber rujukan).
Williamson, J. G. (1965). Regional inequality and the process of national development: A description of patterns. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 13(4), 3-45.
Nilawati, E. (2019). Analisis dan Strategi Peningkatan Pendapatan Asli Daerah (PAD) di Kabupaten Gunungkidul. Jurnal Maksipreneur: Manajemen, Koperasi, Dan Entrepreneurship, 9(1), 41–60.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Jurnal Kajian Ekonomi dan Studi Pembangunan

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).












